Credit: Stock photo

Credit: Stock photo

In Orange County, dwelling house to the Disneyland measles outbreak that spread to 7 other states and fueled a strict California vaccination law this year, attorneys for the Orange County Section of Education have stated that the new vaccination requirements utilise every bit to special educational activity students, a group that some thought would exist exempt because of their federally protected correct to educational services.

In a memo issued concluding month, the Orange Canton Department of Didactics has advised its 28 school districts that students in special education must comply with the law, which as of July i, 2016, gives students who are due to be vaccinated 3 options: obtain a medical exemption to the required vaccinations, enroll in homeschooling or independent study, or exist vaccinated before attending school. The law removed, as of Jan. 1, 2016, the ability of parents to pass up to vaccinate their children in public and private school because of personal opposition.

"The constabulary doesn't say they are exempt," said Ronald Wenkart, general counsel for the Orange Canton Section of Pedagogy and the writer of the memo. If the lawmakers who drafted the legislation had wanted to exempt special education students, "they could accept put an exemption in in that location," he said.

"The law doesn't say they are exempt," said Ronald Wenkart, general counsel for the Orange County Department of Education.

Many parents who opposed the new vaccination police, known as Senate Beak 277, believed that special didactics students would exist exempt because of language in the beak, inserted late in the legislative process, that they felt guaranteed federally protected educational services no matter what. The law states that information technology "does non prohibit" a pupil who qualifies for a special didactics from "accessing whatsoever special educational activity and related services." No details are provided.

But the meaning of the phrase "accessing whatsoever special education and related services" has not notwithstanding been clarified by the California Department of Public Health, which is charged with issuing regulations and guidance to schools about the vaccination law. The Orangish County Office of Teaching appears to be one of the offset education agencies to offer an interpretation.

Its memo has surprised and upset some parents of unvaccinated students in special education, said Kristie Sepulveda-Burchit, executive director of Educate Advocate, a Southern California-based nonprofit organization of parents of children with special needs.

"In that location'south a  lot of anxiety, a lot of frustration and the feeling that nosotros were lied to," Sepulveda-Burchit said. "Pretty much anyone yous talk to was under the impression that students with an IEP (Individualized Education Program) were exempt from the neb."

But that is non how the Orange County Section of Pedagogy sees information technology.

"I don't think at that place is whatever difference between general education and special education in terms of vaccinations," Wenkart said. "Information technology's the same rules."

He said the federal guarantee of a "gratis and advisable education" for students with disabilities does non conflict with the state law requiring that students be vaccinated.

"A child is entitled to a complimentary and appropriate educational activity and you as well accept a legal obligation to vaccinate your child," he said. Wenkart did not provide further explanation about how schools would provide special education services to unvaccinated students.

He added, "If a parent chooses to violate the police force, consequences could follow." Subsequently notifying parents in writing nigh the requirements of Senate Neb 277, school districts could contact the Orange Canton Health Care Agency for help, he said.

And parents could terminate up in court, he said. "They'd have to present what would be their reason for non vaccinating their child," Wenkart said. "If they believe vaccinations are harmful, the burden of proof is on them and they'd have to provide medical backup." A school district could seek a court society to force parents to comply with the police force, he said.

The legal opinion of the Orange County Department of Didactics is not the final discussion. The California Section of Public Wellness said that with regard to special education students, information technology "is reviewing the new law and coming together with partners to determine what guidance might exist needed."

Jennifer Nix, an attorney with the Santa Rosa-based School and College Legal Services of California, which advises school districts in counties that include Sonoma, Marin and Mendocino, noted that the federal law is clear in requiring that students who qualify for special education receive those services.

"Federal police always trumps state law, if they can't exist implemented at the same time," Nix said.

Paul Lavigne, executive director of the Greater Anaheim Special Education Local Programme Expanse, a regional organization that oversees special education services in districts, said his organization is waiting for farther guidance."Information technology's ane of these situations where the interpretation of the law is going to be the issue," he said.

At the lath meeting scheduled for Monday at the Orangish Canton Section of Teaching in Costa Mesa, Sepulveda-Burchit and other members of Educate Advocate are "hoping to become some more answers," she said.

"This brings fright to a whole other level for parents of kids with special needs," she said of the memo.

To become more reports like this i, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in didactics.